site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 1873 results for

domain:parrhesia.co

Kindles? iPads

Other than the (I suspect partially trendy) AuDHD? Something to do with physical mobility, but I've never learned what. Has needed a walker to get around for ages, and is certainly not yet old enough where that'd be unremarkable.

Famously, the entire corpus of Jane Austen.

I mean if you just mean 'written by a woman' the Hunger Games trilogy had broad appeal.

There's been quite a lot of Christian big name science fiction writers, actually- Jerry Pournelle was Christian even if he changed denominations a lot, CS Lewis wrote science fiction, etc.

Fair, was speaking more to the extent that they're basically rat-monkeys.

If we're counting LDS as Christian, Orson Scott Card and Larry Correia might rival him depending on how you count 'successful'.

You're thinking too much in terms of the general election. In an election where a politician gets 100% of the votes, the process (primary/party otherwise) by which they were selected is the real election.

It's not a stable equilibrium point.

Plus you get a bunch of loonies in Congress because the district is so far off center that the primary is the larger hurdle.

This is a good to catch up with it. The epilogue just finished yesterday (for Unsounded proper: the second half will have a new title and begin in January.)

I still haven't seen the last one, and should be surprised if I ever do.

I feel so seen haha. I also refused to watch the last one. Can't even remember its name if I'm being honest. Total fundamental drop off of interest.

You know I also thought Rogue One scratched the itch - interesting. Lots of the more traditional non-woke critics hated it.

Andor was actively incredible though (although I have yet to see the second season, just timing issues).

Lewis's Space Trilogy does a pretty excellent job, I think.

I was wondering how a Christian worldview would mesh with interplanetary science fiction, but this explains it.

the ridiculous shoot or move but not both (without perks) in the newer ones.

That's not a thing in general. You can both move and shoot, unless you are using a sniper rifle.

Full-strength no caveat endorsements for recent releases:

You should play them if you haven't.

As I recall he sold it well below what he’d have received in an open bidding process because thought Disney and Iger would be better stewards of the brand.

I’m hoping Ascent of Ashes lives up to the hype I have for it. Getting another real time with pause colony sim would be a dream come true, especially if it’s more focused on exploration and combat than Rimworld

Seconding Unsounded. I haven't caught up in a couple years, but the first arc was absolutely fantastic. Also, I would argue Sette is amazing from the very start; I get that people might think of her as a "girl boss", given that she's a... girl(?) and is certainly bossy, but the thing is that her confidence is very obviously artificial, and that while she is in fact quite competent in a variety of ways from the start, the gap between her competence and the situation she's stuck in is immediately obvious, and quite stark. Also, the rest of the characters, male and female, are really, really well done. Duane is amazing as a portrait of a man of principles slowly being ground down by an unprincipled world.

Also, Kill Six Billion Demons, which I likewise am a couple years behind on, but was amazing as far as I've read.

Well sure from a deterministic perspective this is trivially true, but the sense we are using it is that a woman doesn't have to do anything in order to be wifed up and have a decent lower-middle-class family life except excercise judgement over which specific suitors she ought to choose. In this frame, far from being slop, Twilight is actually the core female struggle heightened by supernatural fantasy elements.

Sam Hyde has some advice about this.

Will do!

That sounds like Total War my guy, with the exception of the farms (maybe in Napoleon or Empire). Very different game, of course. I think Manor Lords might be relatively close to your vision.

Yes, it's this exactly. I used to dream about the prequel and sequel trilogies coming out. Had one where I found the sequels in the store and was gobsmacked that they'd made it to home video without me hearing about their release, etc.

Then the prequels came out and I was fairly disappointed but fundamentally tolerant. Then the sequels came out and, well, I still haven't seen the last one, and should be surprised if I ever do.

Rogue One scratched the itch though.

?

The guns have stats. Your soldiers have stats. You have Time Units, which forces a choice between movement and action, but in the manner of the old XCOM games as opposed to the ridiculous shoot or move but not both (without perks) in the newer ones.

You bother to aim the guns when you need a sniper to dome someone, or a shotgunner to aim around a shield, or an MG/grenadier to ruin some cover. Each gun has an accuracy stat that governs its accuracy in minutes of arc. Soldiers can tighten that with experience or weapon proficiency.

Would you object to aiming grenades or RPGs in XCOM? Then why not guns? Especially with the ridiculous amount of flexibility it adds.

He's LDS at any rate.