site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 25 of 8139 results for

domain:rifters.com

That's a pretty accurate guess! Of course, the fact that they had free and very decent housing, that made the wages go much further. I almost get the impression that several commodities and amenities have shifted greatly in relative pricing. Property was cheap, food expensive. A doctor they knew was said to spend an incredible amount of money on food, and we're talking groceries, not dining out. I couldn't spend a thousand pounds on normal food at a Tesco today if I tried.

I mean it seems to be clearly multifactorial and a perfect storm situation - lock everyone up with a lot of fear and guilt, have this roiling social justice/woke thing that's been fermenting increasingly unquietly for years, and have a lot of money and power and propaganda trying to aim itself at Trump and anything that seems Trump related. Boom.

A number of non-conspiracy conspiracy theories over the years have commented on this like foreign funding trying to divide America and Democrat aligned sources trying to create division to make Trump bad.

I'm waiting for them to add some sort of endgame. Its like 0.9 and been in EA for years.

Conversely, NY, CA, WA, etc... could be significantly more gerrymandered.

Uh, without some blatantly illegal actions, none of those three could be really any more gerrymandered than they already are. NY was a 57-43 D-R split last election, and yet splits seats 19-7 (76-24%), CA was a 60-40 split and yet seats are split 43-9 (82-18%), and WA was 57-43 splitting seats 8-2.

Conversely Texas was 58-40 with independents, and split seats 25-13 (66-34%).

The problem (and dirty secret) of the DNC in this whole dust up is they have no juice left to squeeze. Their biggest safe states are already gerrymandered as hell, and even friendly courts only bend so far. Gavin Newsome won't do shit because if he pushes harder he might get his already incredibly advantageous map thrown out for one that might more proportionately represent the voters.

To his credit though- he's not as cringe as the Connecticut democratic party and governor who are taking the high road on social media about how they are "avoiding partisan warfare". This conveniently glossed over the fact thst they have already achieved what is proportionally the most gerrymandered state in Amwrican history- the 42% of GOP voters gets exactly zero congress critters, a flawless victory.

I also read the entire Wrinkle in Time series as a kid. Great books (and while not explicitly Christian, very Christian-influenced).

Sometimes jokes can’t be explained without ruining the joke and therefore are “low effort” but jokes should be the exception

It begs the question why did the world lose its mind over that incident?

The first one was a pure reshoot of ANH. The second misconstrued “subverting expectations” with writing a movie. The final one was writing by a precursor of AI.

Wasn’t the grandma the antagonist?

Did I say skilled manufacturing labor? Or was that what you had an argument ready for, and you figured my post was as good a place as any?

Oh. I never heard about that (whereas I vaguely recall watching the first anime, probably while I was preschool-aged).

Still waiting for the character creator.

I put down Elden Ring last week. Will hopefully continue on it soon, despite my poor record of picking games back up again. I have a pretty solid character in that game. Level 82.

I'm playing some Civilization V right now. I've put custom names on my empire/ruler, etc. Makes it a bit more personal. :3 Immortal difficulty is difficult when not using one of the most OP civs. But I'm in good shape in my current game. I was the first to reach my chosen ideology and I've attained control of most city states worth allying with.

If the plan was 'escape to not-Hoth and hole up in a fortress against much stronger space and ground opponents' then it may as well not exist. I don't recall any reference to cloaked ships either.

How can you write such list and omit The two strong women in western action movie canon: Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor? Zero girlbossing, 100% believable authority, Significant Relationship Stuff, all while exhibiting classic female traits. I’ve never heard a single guy say anything bad about either character.

Ageism!

Or rather- I wanted to pull from relatively recent characters, while Ripley and Connor were much older (as in, pre-2000s) characters who might be filed under a 'well, writing was better back in the day.' Newer characters with still-younger audiences make a stronger point on current audience-reception dynamics.

Crystal?

Modern economic theory is founded on the premise of the rational actor. My economic theory is founded on the premise of the retarded actor.

Unpleasant and offputting to some extent = "picked no suitor, which is by definition not the correct suitor".

I think my limit on "significantly loses attractiveness due to weight" is about BMI 35 or so (100kg/220lb at 168cm/5'6''), which is significantly into the "obese" range.

Alien.

4 years > 1 quarter

By their nature, private businesses shouldbe focused on the long term if you consider a purely theoretical universe populated by homo economicus.

Private companies in the real world, headed by real humans, only rarely tend to be concerned with the long term.

Any rumours of Xcom 3?

Sailor Moon is too old for that anyway. It finished in '97.

Have you watched Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles?

I was just revisiting it and God, it’s good. They focus a bit more on the motherly side of Sarah and the difficulties she has trying to bring up a son and keep him safe, whilst keeping her every bit as badass. John Connor grows in a very realistic and impressive way over the course of the series, and the new characters are very good too.